Australia’s International ‘Nature Constructive’ Summit options Indigenous voices, however little authorities motion

Discover: Transcripts are machine and human generated and evenly edited for accuracy. They could include errors.

Barry Hunter: Look, I feel the summit, and there’s loads of criticism in direction of the Australian authorities, and I do wanna commend them on the work that they’ve carried out bringing this collectively. But it surely doesn’t forsake that a number of the criticism sits there round what does world nature optimistic really imply? Like having the ability to on one hand say that we’re addressing the intricate and big points that we now have to cope with round this house. Are we really in optimistic doing that, or are we ranging from a deficit? So yeah, like I prefer to be at all times the half glass full and say that we’re coping with positives. However, yeah, there’s at all times that doubt at the back of anybody’s thoughts.

Mike DiGirolamo (narration): Welcome to the Mongabay Newscast. I’m your cohost Mike DiGirolamo. Bringing you weekly conversations with consultants, authors, scientists and activists. Engaged on the entrance traces of conservation. Shining a lightweight on a number of the most urgent points going through our planet. And holding individuals in energy to account. This podcast is edited on Gadigal land. Right now on the Newscast, I take you contained in the world’s first International Nature Constructive Summit. Which was hosted in Sydney, Australia on the ICC theater. Led by the Australian authorities, the summit introduced collectively leaders, consultants, scientists, and NGOs from world wide to debate biodiversity safety, assembly the objectives outlined within the International Biodiversity Framework that had been agreed to at COP 15 in Montreal, personal funding and different market-based devices, akin to carbon or biodiversity credit. On this episode, I interview two delegates to the conference, in addition to a conservation scientist for his or her tackle how the summit went, how they really feel concerning the state of biodiversity. The ’30×30′ objectives outlined in Kunming-Montreal, Australia’s observe document with environmental safety, and what sort of motion they wish to see now. Australia’s minister of setting and water, Tanya Plibersek, said again in 2022 that there wasn’t “one other minute to waste” to reform Australia’s environmental legal guidelines, which many consultants, together with the minister herself have mentioned are damaged. However practically two years on, reforms to the EPBC act, the Environmental Safety and Biodiversity Conservation Act haven’t come to cross. And whereas the minister introduced that Australia could be increasing its marine protected areas by over 300,000 sq. kilometers and thus defending over 52% of its ocean, consultants have instructed the Guardian that determine is deceptive. Now when the minister first launched her Nature Constructive plan in December of 2022, she set a goal of zero extinctions and a stronger emissions discount goal with a transparent path to internet zero amongst many different aspirations. But that very same month Australia had 116 new coal oil and gasoline tasks deliberate and he or she accredited three coal mine extensions simply final month. And 400 kilometers from Sydney and new south Wales the forestry company is commencing logging in a habitat for a number of the most endangered and iconic marsupials on the continent, the larger glider and koala. Many of those actions from the labor authorities and the minister had been characterised as hypocrisy as reported on within the Guardian. As a journalist attending the summit, I seemed for any sort of acknowledgement or remark from the federal government on these conflicting actions and the way they’re being perceived by the general public. However I didn’t see any. I reached out to the minister two weeks upfront of the summit to get her remark however was not granted an interview. The individuals I did interview for this podcast, nonetheless, offered their perception, information, and proposals about what it means to take motion and make good on conservation guarantees for the those that steward the land and the setting. First, I interviewed Barry Hunter, a descendant of the Djabugay, individuals and CEO of the Indigenous led nonprofit, the North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Administration Alliance. He spoke within the opening plenary and talked about that what actually must occur is motion. So, Barry gave me his ideas on what taking motion appears like particularly to honor the aspirations of Indigenous and First Nations individuals in Australia.

Barry: Barry Hunter, I’m the Chief Govt Officer of the North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Administration Alliance.

Mike: And also you talked about within the panel that you simply spoke in that the largest takeaway for you is that it’s time for motion. So, what does this motion appear like?

Barry: Anyplace in Australia, notably throughout the North that I do know of there are Indigenous land and sea rangers who’re actively on Nation doing work that we communicate of, by way of in broader sense at boards akin to this, in order that’s actually the tire hitting the street. There’s actual stuff occurring there, so it’s round having the ability to, be sure that these kind of issues can proceed and the actual biodiversity values that we see on Nation and nature, that we see on Nation and that on Nation time period refers back to the broader setting the place persons are related. As a result of Nation isn’t actually something with out individuals connection to it. and interacting and generally we do dangerous issues to it, however generally we try to help nature in repairing and, the, that unimaginable work. So yeah, that’s what I’m speaking about, that there’s actual issues occurring in actual time. And it’s having the ability to frequently assist these actual investments and we all know we hear these kind of figures round 200 billion, that’s required yearly to deal with world biodiversity decline. So how will we maneuver these? And people elements and that useful resource, to get individuals to actual motion on the bottom. And that’s what I’m actually advocating for and pushing for. We’ve acquired that many frameworks for that many plans. We’ve acquired an entire lot of various methods that talk to motion, however none of them are and he’s good except persons are on the market really doing the work.

Mike: So, in your work with the North Australian Land and Sea Administration Alliance, your group makes use of a tradition primarily based economic system method. Are you able to clarify extra about what that’s?

Barry: So, particularly, that’s about, supporting these teams that I spoke of on the bottom, and there’s extra. It’s not essentially simply the Indigenous Land and Sea Facilities, however we additionally work with organizations which will have an entire lot of aspiration and little or no capability and functionality, however they’ve acquired some good sound governance and we do have a standards round that. In order that work is explicit is, round supporting and constructing these elements in order that these organizations can then construct that cultural primarily based economic system. And that cultural primarily based economic system relies on their aspirations. So how do they guarantee revenue in and round ecosystem companies? How do they guarantee revenue for the governance work that they should do in bringing individuals’s voices into these explicit realms. And it’s additionally about having the ability to construct frameworks in order that we will push again into the likes of presidency and different environmental NGOs to say, “Hey, this work goes. Why don’t you leap behind it and assist it?” However primarily based on the cultural aspirations of these teams, quite than primarily based on some top-down method that, that authorities or environmental NGOs could convey into it.

Mike: And talking of those frameworks which might be being agreed to, such because the Kunming Montreal Settlement, Indigenous rights consultants have identified that the Kunming Montreal Settlement has little readability on how attaining the 30 by 30 objectives will influence Indigenous communities. And a few are saying that hundreds of thousands could possibly be evicted from their ancestral lands if these objectives aren’t applied rigorously. So, what are your ideas on the GBF and the dearth of readability on the way it will influence Indigenous communities?

Barry: Yeah. And I do wish to quote that determine that’s on the International Biodiversity Framework web site, in addition to the CBD web site that speak round 80 p.c of the world’s biodiversity is on lands which might be stewarded by Indigenous peoples. So clearly, there’s a powerful position for Indigenous peoples to play inside that course of. I, assume inside these phrases is the readability across the particulars. Clearly, you possibly can’t have and for me you possibly can’t have land with out individuals and I already mentioned that. And you may’t have biodiversity outcomes that enhance and restore nature or regenerate nature with out individuals. So, it’s essential and for Indigenous peoples to play that lead position inside that on their lands. And I assume that imposition of exterior forces to have the ability to shift individuals off land isn’t serving anybody, least of all what persons are making an attempt to deal with with regard to these, essential points that we all know biodiversity is going through There’s a powerful saying inside Australia that, Nation wants individuals but it surely’s additionally the identical within the reverse as properly, that individuals want Nation to have the ability to meet these wants and aspirations and obligations, there’s robust cultural obligations that individuals have to have the ability to take care of Nation.

Mike: There’s a been loads of point out of markets right here on the summit and conservationists and scientists have criticized and expressed considerations over issues akin to biodiversity credit or carbon credit, which have many documented situations of failing to dwell as much as their guarantees. Are you involved concerning the integrity and implementation of those? And if that’s the case, how might they be carried out justly and successfully in your view?

Barry: Sure, I’m involved of that integrity round that house. And I do wish to get one thing actually clear and that’s, that when methods are constructed and there’s some stage of compliance so as, and rigor, to be able to make that system sound and workable and acceptable, to say that there’s sound outcomes with regard to what’s being mentioned and achieved inside both the credit score or the offset. However the essential factor is to not confuse compliance with integrity. As a result of individuals will go “Oh, we’ve carried out this and this we’ve acquired integrity.” No, you’ve carried out this and this so that you’re compliant which is a giant distinction. The integrity speaks to the social and cultural and certainly environmental outcomes that we see that would wish to come back out of any kind of these processes and that integrity inside that house talks to, once more, what I simply mentioned about individuals being related to Nation, individuals enjoying a powerful position. And their aspirations are being met by way of having the ability to take care of the obligations they should take care of Nation.

Mike: And on that observe, Free Prior and Knowledgeable Consent, or FPIC, isn’t presently enforced adequately in any nation, together with this one, but it surely’s a part of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Barry, what are your ideas on Australia’s document of consulting First Nations? What do you assume the Nation must do to raised be sure that First Nations are consulted about issues that influence them, their land and their tradition.

Barry: Yeah, and that’s an attention-grabbing time period and that you simply simply use round consulting as a result of for me that has numerous connotations by way of if somebody walks as much as me and talks to me about a problem in relation to say the biodiversity framework, then they’ve consulted with me. Was I knowledgeable? Inside regards to the rules of FPIC? These issues have to be continuously strengthened and have to be continuously part of processes. In order that they’re not second to course of or they’re not extra to processes. They ‘re ingrained inside processes. And people processes speak to, on this case, Indigenous individuals completely being knowledgeable and conscious of what they’re getting into into, after which conscious of the outcomes that, they have to be a part of the options as properly, we’re in that so yeah. I kind of shiver and generally once I hear these phrases being spoken, like there are some kind of, “Oh, we have to do FPIC”, Nicely, no.. you could combine, you could present and you could display some clear outcomes and understandings with regard to that course of and people phrases.

Mike: Are there any tasks that you simply’re presently engaged on proper now that you simply’re notably enthusiastic about that you simply’d like to spotlight?

Barry: Yeah, so the Indigenous Nation Biodiversity Alliance is bringing collectively 4 robust Indigenous organisations and we cowl giant tracts of Nation throughout Northern Australia. And people organisations embrace the Aboriginal Carbon Basis, Kimberley Land Council, NAILSMA, my organisation, North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Administration Alliance and the Indigenous Desert Alliance and we’re growing strategies which will go to ecosystem companies or the laws we’ve acquired in Australia across the nature restore and people strategies are Indigenous led and Indigenous knowledgeable and the goal is to have the ability to create the house for these strategies to then flip into tasks that may be granted certificates beneath the Nature Restore. And certainly, then hopefully, the intent is to, is for these sort of processes to create you already know, wealth creation alternatives or further funding into these issues by way of on floor outcomes and paying for that. So yeah, that’s actually thrilling. I’m actually excited and there’s loads of energy. And like I mentioned we cowl giant tracts of Australia by way of what we’re doing and the method that we’re, doing and our organizations are understandably Indigenous led organizations with all Indigenous chief government officers and we’ve been engaged on constructing the governance after which inside the governance, then having the ability to construct the method to begin incubating the strategies after which work with communities in order that these strategies can develop and prosper and, they, and so they nonetheless have the identical rigor. Now we have scientists concerned in these course of and we now have Indigenous information leaders concerned in these processes. So, we will convey all these issues collectively to have a sound course of and the sound strategies and, then, finally you may have further revenue. In order that Indigenous communities can proceed the great work that they’re doing.

Mike: Do you may have any concluding ideas concerning the summit?

Barry: Look, I feel the summit, and there’s loads of criticism in direction of the Australian authorities, and I do wanna commend them on the work that they’ve carried out when bringing this collectively. But it surely doesn’t forsake that a number of the criticism sits there round what does world nature optimistic really imply? Like having the ability to on one hand say that we’re addressing the intricate and big points that we now have to cope with round this house. Are we really in optimistic doing that, or are we ranging from a deficit? So yeah, like I prefer to be at all times the half glass full and say that we’re coping with positives. However, yeah, there’s at all times that, that doubt at the back of anybody’s thoughts. However look, I feel there’s some wonderful discussions. I feel there’s some wonderful thought processes which might be popping out. And, as we began off the dialog, for me, it was at all times about saying these kind of issues can go on and we will proceed to speak about it, however we have to present that motion on the bottom and we have to get transferring with it.

Mike: Barry, thanks a lot on your time. It’s been a pleasure talking with you.

Barry: Thanks, Mike.

Mike (narration): I additionally spoke with Eliane Ubalijoro the CEO of CIFOR-ICRAF the Middle for Worldwide Forestry Analysis and World Agroforestry. She previewed an initiative to trace and measure not simply the ecological influence of their work, however the social as properly. A key consideration when contemplating the justice and integrity of the 30×30 objectives

Eliane: I’m Eliane Ubalijoro. I’m the CEO of CIFOR-ICRAF. So, we work all around the world, notably in Asia/Pacific, Africa, and Latin America. And so, our work is basically centered on nature-based options and on tree primarily based methods. So, we work in agroforestry, forestry, and soil well being. And so, our work actually focuses on how will we harness nature primarily based options on the interface of forestry, agriculture, and the corridors for nature wanted to convey again a nature optimistic world.

Mike: And so, you talked about within the plenary that you simply simply spoke in that you simply had some other ways of measuring not simply, tree cowl and biodiversity, but in addition the social impacts for native and Indigenous communities. Are you able to speak about these?

Eliane: Sure. So, inside CIFOR-ICRAF, we now have a governance, fairness, and social inclusion piece the place we now have a group that actually focuses on how will we ensure we’re wanting on the social components. It’s actually essential that we take a look at pure capital and bringing again biodiversity whereas we sequester carbon, however we additionally want to verify we’re additionally human and social capital. And so, we now have anthropologists, we now have gender consultants, we now have consultants that work with Indigenous populations, and we actually take a look at how will we middle individuals within the work we do, how will we middle fairness within the work we do. So it’s actually essential for us that as we do that work, we actually be sure that we’re understanding how our marginalized neighborhood is displaying up, how will we be sure that their voices are amplified, and the way will we be sure that every time doable, if our science is a device that can be utilized that we create frameworks the place they will discover ways to harness the instruments we now have by way of higher negotiating circumstances, as a result of what we actually promote is how will we be sure that there’s tasks have excessive integrity carbon, excessive integrity biodiversity and excessive integrity neighborhood advantages. And to make sure that we actually want to make sure that we convey all of the populations which might be concerned to the desk.

Mike: Some Indigenous teams and activists have voiced considerations concerning the Kunming Montreal settlement by way of its influence on native Indigenous communities, with some saying that doubtlessly hundreds of thousands could possibly be evicted from their ancestral lands. What do you concentrate on these considerations and the dearth of readability in Kunming Montreal and the way it will influence Indigenous communities?

Eliane: We all know that Indigenous communities steward 80 p.c of the biodiversity on the Earth at CIFOR-ICRAF, what we see as actually essential is how we work with Indigenous communities in understanding how are the most effective methods we have to work ahead to actually take a look at how are we integrating biodiversity in nature primarily based options, in our meals methods, and the best way to respect the social cultural biodiversity that Indigenous populations convey to the desk. And in our work in Brazil we actually see this as very essential to have that management of the Indigenous voices within the work we do, and to actually be sure that the work we do respects that social cultural biodiversity, and that in how we’re training agroforestry, we’re actually creating methods that convey again nature, that respect Indigenous tradition, that respect methods of realizing which might be native, and that we combine these methods within the work we do.

Mike: And do you may have any concluding ideas about what has transpired right here on the summit?

Eliane: The summit could be very thrilling as a result of we, for any person like me, it’s like a nature optimistic internet zero world is the aspiration. It’s the work we do on daily basis. And so, realizing that the Australian authorities is taking management on this house to have convened this occasion, I feel for me is a very essential testomony to the management that’s being taken within the regent and to actually have it amplified and moved ahead because the three COPS occur this 12 months. And as we transfer in direction of 2025 in Belem.

Mike: Eliane, thanks a lot for talking with me. It was a pleasure.

Eliane: Pleasure. Thanks.

Mike (narration): Hi there, as soon as once more, I hope you’re having fun with this protection of the International Nature Constructive Summit. And thanks as at all times for tuning in and listening to the Mongabay Newscast. I simply needed to present you slightly reminder to please subscribe to us on the podcast supplier of your selection or hold updated on all issues Mongabay by subscribing to our weekly e-newsletter, which you are able to do by clicking on the button within the higher proper hand nook on the touchdown web page at mongabay.com. Thanks as at all times and now again to the summit. Lastly, I spoke with Dr. Ben Pitcher from the Taronga Conservation Society on a go to to Sydney’s flagship zoo. Pitcher is a behavioral and sensory ecologist who has carried out loads of work finding out the regent honey eater, a critically endangered chook that Pitcher tells me would be the litmus take a look at for whether or not or not the Australian authorities will make good on their promise of no new extinctions.

Ben: I’m Dr. Ben Pitcher. I’m behavioral biologist at Taronga Conservation Society, and I work on the science round our restoration packages, and notably issues just like the regent honey eater.

Mike: And so, you had been speaking to us earlier concerning the regent honey eater and also you described it because the litmus take a look at of the Australian authorities’s coverage on no new extinctions. Are you able to elaborate on what you imply by that?

Ben: That’s proper. The regent honey eater is a critically endangered species. We all know there’s solely about 250 of them left within the wild. And regardless of 25 years of restoration program, the inhabitants remains to be declining. If we’re to don’t have any new extinctions, this is likely one of the species that’s going to be the take a look at. Our inhabitants modelling has proven that if we don’t flip the species round within the subsequent 5 years, we’ve solely acquired about 20 years of this species left with us.

Mike: And also you talked about that it was like an umbrella species for, different species as properly, by way of the safety of it. Are you able to clarify extra about that?

Ben: That’s proper. The regent honeyeater is reliant on boxgum, grassy woodland, which is likely one of the habitats that we’ve cleared probably the most in Australia. Sadly, we’re nonetheless clearing that as properly, which is, actually one of many issues that we have to halt if we’re to guard this species. However that habitat can also be essential habitat for a number of different threatened species which might be in Australia that we all know that if we don’t shield them, the probability of them going extinct in 50 years, in 100 years, sorry, is about 50%. Placing the hassle into defending the regent honeyeater now could have these circulation on results for these different species as properly.

Mike: You talked about that each, now appropriate me if I’m incorrect, you talked about that each species within the zoo that’s threatened has a 50-50 probability. What do you imply by that?

Ben: Yeah, in order that’s each threatened species in New South Wales, within the state of New South Wales has been assessed and about 50 p.c of these species will probably go extinct inside 100 years except we actually ramp up our conservation efforts. So if we proceed enterprise as ordinary, we’re going to lose half of this, the threatened species within the state.

Mike: And so, what does that appear like then if we don’t proceed enterprise as ordinary? What does it particularly appear like if we’re really making good on that promise?

Ben: Nicely, notably for a species just like the regent honey eater, at the start, outdoors of the zoo is habitat safety. We actually must tighten up our land clearing and take into account each piece of remaining regent Honeyeater habitat as essential habitat that must be protected. We have to additionally enhance the habitat we now have, so restoration tasks, rising connectivity in these habitats. Past that, we have to enhance the capability in our restoration program. So, we breed birds right here on the zoo and at different zoos round Australia, however we have to principally double that capability in order that we nonetheless have a very good insurance coverage inhabitants within the zoo and have the capability to be releasing birds into the wild. After which thirdly, we actually want to extend recruitment of birds within the wild. One of many massive threats to the regent honeyeater is now that their inhabitants has gotten so small, is competitors and predation from different species. And that’s pressures that, if the inhabitants was wholesome, they’d have the ability to maintain. As a result of they’re so small, that’s actually inflicting issues. We have to be on the bottom managing these populations. And it’s not a choose and blend lolly retailer the place we will say, “Oh, let’s do that slightly bit. Let’s do this slightly bit.” The modeling has proven us that if we actually wish to save this species, we now have to do the whole lot that we now have in that listing to save lots of this species. We are able to’t simply say, let’s do that slightly bit now. And we’ll wait 10 years to do this different bit. It’s the whole lot immediately.

Mike: One thing that acquired talked about so much on the summit seems to be, markets and credit and offsets and like this financialization of nature. And there wasn’t an entire lot of like speak about making new protected areas per se. So, what’s your opinion on just like the biodiversity offset market as a automobile for conservation?

Ben: I’m definitely not an knowledgeable on it, so it’s simply my opinion. Nevertheless. In the case of a species just like the regent honeyeater, if we’re speaking about offsetting habitat loss, we will’t afford it. That habitat is so worthwhile. There’s no financial worth that we will, placed on that as a result of this species will probably be extinct in 20 years if we don’t do one thing. If we let habitat be cleared, take cash and construct habitat some other place, it’s going to be 20 years earlier than that habitat is viable. So, from that perspective, I don’t assume offsets are a very good transfer for this kind of species. Nevertheless, that being mentioned, a species like this that’s nomadic and ranges throughout such a large space can’t be protected solely on conservation lands. So, it’s a species that requires safety throughout an entire vary of tenures. So, from that, we want purchase in from an entire pile of individuals. So, cash and funding and conservation on personal lands, on enterprise owned lands and the whole lot, all of that’s important.

Mike: Is it honest to say that that is the case for plenty of species?

Ben: Completely. Completely. I concentrate on the regent honeyeater as a result of that’s the one I work on. But when we stroll down the hall and spoke to certainly one of my different colleagues right here on the zoo, they’d let you know a really related story for a small mammal or for a frog. And, when, you hear that story over and over, it actually does, have these flashing lights saying we now have to do that now. No new extinctions is a superb goal to have. That’s the goal we must always have. to do this, there’s really loads of work behind that and loads of funding and dedication as a result of, that’s not a small process for anybody species. That’s not a small process and we’ve acquired, simply inside the zoo right here alone, we’ve acquired, tens of species that applies to and that’s right here at Taronga, and also you go and take a look at one other zoo in Australia, you’ve acquired the identical story, you look internationally, you’ve acquired the identical story, it’s a world scale to, going past Australia’s dedication, going to a world dedication, we will do it if we put money into it, we’re a wealthy world, however we simply must make that dedication.

Mike: So, one thing that was mentioned early on within the present authorities’s administration was that we will’t waste one other minute to reform our damaged environmental legal guidelines. However we’ve seen delays on reforms to the EPBC Act. Do you may have any ideas about that?

Ben: Once more, I’m not a, I’m not a coverage knowledgeable, so I don’t know the high-quality particulars. Nevertheless, I might, I might welcome revision to the coverage as a result of we’ve discovered so much within the time that we’ve had the coverage. The EPBC Act, I keep in mind once I was in highschool when, it got here in and on the time it was thought of groundbreaking and unbelievable environmental regulation. However, in any environmental state of affairs, it’s not a set and neglect kind of factor, we all know much more now than we did when it got here in. And so, it’s honest to say, sure, let’s revise this coverage. Past that although, we don’t have to attend for that coverage to be revised to be able to take motion for these, species. We’ve, for every of those species that we, know are in hassle, we’ve acquired restoration plans. We’ve acquired inhabitants modeling. We all know what we have to do. We simply want the dedication to do it.

Mike: Ben, thanks a lot for talking with me.

Ben: Absolute pleasure. Thanks.

Mike (narration): The opening music featured on this podcast is from a Yidaki, performed within the Welcome to Nation ceremony by Darran Williams. For associated Mongabay protection of the Kunming Montreal settlement and Australian biodiversity offsets, and critically endangered species, please see the hyperlinks within the present notes. As at all times, in case you’re having fun with the Mongabay Newscast or any of our podcast content material and also you wish to assist us out we encourage you to unfold the phrase concerning the work we’re doing by telling a buddy. Phrase of mouth is one of the simplest ways to assist develop our attain, however it’s also possible to assist us by turning into a month-to-month sponsor by way of our Patreon web page at patreon.com/Mongabay. We’re a nonprofit information outlet. So meaning a greenback monthly makes a reasonably large distinction and it helps us offset the manufacturing prices. So, in case you’re a fan of our audio studies from nature’s frontline, go to patreon.com/Mongabay to be taught extra and assist the Mongabay Newscast and all of our podcast content material. You and your mates can be a part of the listeners who’ve downloaded the Mongabay Newscast over half 1,000,000 occasions by subscribing to this podcast wherever you get your podcasts from, or you possibly can obtain our app for Apple and Android units. Simply search both app retailer for the Mongabay Newscast app to achieve fingertip entry to new exhibits and all of our earlier episodes. However it’s also possible to learn our information and inspiration from nature’s frontline at mongabay.com. Or you possibly can comply with us on social media. Discover Mongabay by way of our accounts on LinkedIn at Mongabay Information and on Instagram, Threads, Bluesky, Mastodon, Fb and TikTok. The place our deal with is @ Mongabay or on YouTube @Mongabay TV. Thanks as at all times for listening.